beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.06.01 2015고단526

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant got bad credit as a bad credit, the Defendant had a mind to use the loan from the capital company as if he purchased a vehicle in the name of B.

1. On July 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the private document forgery and the instant investigation document; (b) entered the name “B” in the name column; (c) “B” in the name of the Plaintiff’s address; and (d) sent the document “B” to the applicant column for loans under the highest bottom of the document; and (c) marked B’s seal impression impression from B, adjacent to the applicant for the loan, placed at B, adjacent to the applicant for the loan, and issued it to the sales company employees of the automobile, who are not aware of the fact, using a verification sign of the name attached to the office at the time of the second-hand commercial office.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a copy of an application for debate on installment financing in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised the forged application as if it were duly formed.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in paragraph 1, presented an application for a debate on the mistake of a motor vehicle in the name of B forged as mentioned above to the staff of the non-Korean Capital Co., Ltd., the Defendant, as if he obtained B’s installment payments in the purchase loan of the first passenger car (D, 2007 formula), by deceiving the victim as if he had the intent or ability to pay the installment every month.

However, in fact, the defendant prepared the above loan application without permission of B, and even if he did not receive a monthly wage from the injured party, such as the time payment, even if he did not receive the monthly wage from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay monthly installments.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above.