임금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the part concerning the defendant of the judgment of the court of the first instance (excluding the part concerning the conclusion) is as stated in the reasoning, except for partial revision or addition as follows. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The “Defendants” in the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed to “Defendants and Co-Defendant J of the first instance trial,” “Defendant I” to “Defendants,” “Defendant J” to “Co-Defendant J of the first instance trial,” and “attached Table” to “attached Table,” respectively.
Part 4, 2, and 3 of the first instance court's decision shall be revised to "(based on recognition) Gap's 1, 2, and 3 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings."
At the fourth bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the results of the plaintiff E's personal examination, this court" shall be amended to "the results of the plaintiff E's personal examination of the first instance court, and the court of first instance".
"A fact may be recognized" at the fifth bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, "A fact may be recognized, and Eul's testimony is insufficient to reverse the above recognition only with the statement of No. 1 and the testimony of the witness M of the court of first instance, and otherwise without any counter-proof evidence."
On the 6th six pages of the first instance court ruling, the “amount recognized as agreed benefits” shall be deemed as “recognized agreed benefits”, and the “amount claimed as agreed benefits (A)” in the 4th sentence of the same face shall be amended to the amount claimed as “A”) of the agreed benefits and to the number less than the fifth decimal number.”
On the 6th of the first judgment of the court of first instance, the term “recognized agreed pay” for the plaintiff G shall be read as “1,700,000”; “3,200,000” as “3,40,000”; “amount of unpaid benefit”; “amount of unpaid benefit” in the aggregate as “23,125,796”; “23,325,796” as “23,325,796”; “the number of years of continuous service” for the plaintiff C in the second column as “2.087”; “3,127,395” as “3,129,105”; “the number of years of continuous service” in the second column as “3,129,105”; “the number of years of continuous service” in the seventh column as “the number of years of continuous service”; “the number of years of continuous service” in the Plaintiff G” as “the “the number of years of continuous service” in the first column as “the number of years 2080,”; “the number”.