beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.05.20 2016고단452

사기방조

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2015, the name-free boxes will call to the victim C at a place where their whereabouts cannot be known, and then, “No customer who is a national bank is now a customer who would bring his/her resident registration certificate and passbook and receive money as his/her agent.”

such a fact

I would like to report to the police and suspend payment.

"A police officer of the Cyber Investigative Team", the head of a Tong in his name was used as a fraud case of KRW 00 million, and he was identified as a suspect in the case.

why is why the prosecutor's order to attend is refused;

It is necessary to undergo special safety measures as the main body to connect the prosecution now.

"The D Public Prosecutor of Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office is the case number of the principal, No. 2015, No. 60550, which is the suspect.

In order to confirm whether the money deposited in one’s name is related to the case, she deposited money into the account known by us, and made the victim believe that it is true, she transferred KRW 22 million deposited in the victim’s name bank account (E) to the Defendant’s name bank account (F).

Defendant

A around that time, the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government KHaro 152 Kysta Bank 1.5 million won out of the amount transferred at the bank counter of the branch office at the third floor of the Kysta Bank of Gangnam-ro 152, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and at the same 223-ro o, the same o-ro 223-o, deposited the remainder of 7 million won from the bank counter of the branch office of the National Bank, which was deposited at the center of the branch office of the National Bank, in full right of only KRW 7 million, and delivered it to the winners in name and acquired it in return.

As a result, Defendant A had been aware of the fact that the names infinites deceiving the victim and take the property by deceiving the victim, thereby making it easier for Defendant A to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G (tentative name) and C;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on financial transactions and monetary statements.