The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of violation of Article 95-2 subparag. 2 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.