However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On February 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of, and around, the Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) on the street in front of, and after having been on the E-si operated by D, D and D, visited C District with D with D; (c) on the same day, the Defendant called “I ambling from the border F of the Gyeong-gu, and I am to ambly,” and “I am to ambling, I am to this ambling; and (d) assaulted F when I am the chest part of F one time, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Application of the sentencing guidelines [type determination] : The basic area of Class 1 (Interference with and Compelling of Duties in the Place of Recommendation] (Determination of the Place of Recommendation] [the scope of punishment] 6 months to one year and 4 months [the grounds for suspension of execution] - positive social relation clearly, serious reflectivity, and no criminal record of suspension of execution or higher;

2. The sentence shall be determined in the same manner as the disposition is comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) it is necessary to resolve a rumor that calls for the exercise of legitimate public authority; (b) to establish a legal order; (c) to recognize and reflect a criminal act; (d) the criminal punishment records of the defendant (limited to those with no such force and three minor fines) and other various circumstances shown in the trial of this case, such as the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, and environment;