However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is the owner of “F Gameland” in the Gu and America E. A.

No one who violates the rating classification shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from those of the game products as classified, for distribution or use, or display or keep them therefor.

Nevertheless, from April 18, 2013 to July 30, 17:30 of the same month, the Defendant established 39 game software in the above game room and operated the business. The Defendant provided an unspecified number of customers with the game products, which had been deliberated upon by the Game Rating Board, for the purpose of obtaining free gifts with the user’s ability. However, regardless of the game contents classified, the Defendant selected the game machine from some sections, and provided the game products, regardless of the game user’s choice, in which the answer was not dealt with, and the user’s ability was so as not to affect the progress of the game.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board for use.

B. No person shall engage in an act of exchanging, exchanging, arranging, or repurchasing intangible results obtained through the use of game products. At the time and place stated in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant exchanged an item card for exchange of 10,000 won per face value acquired by customers through game at KRW 10,000. Accordingly, the Defendant was engaged in the business of exchanging the results obtained through the use of game products.