beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2014.09.12 2014고정92

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives Csch Rexroth Cargo Vehicles.

On March 17, 2014, at around 14:10, the Defendant: (a) operated the vicinity of a three-lane intersection in front of the Taedo-si, Taedo-si, Taedo-si, as a long as a two-lane road from the yellow local area to the long-lane; (b) entered the road as a safety site located in the center of the road to the long-distance market.

There is a duty of care to operate safely by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the steering system of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded in the same direction as it was driven by the victim D (W, 52 years old) driving in the same direction as it was, the Defendant suffered injury in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as the Defendant’s right-hand driver part of the vehicle, which was driven by the victim D (W, 52 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the report on the traffic accident (the report on actual condition) [the defendant and his defense counsel] claimed that the driver temporarily stopped in the safety zone to confirm the occurrence of any defect of the defendant's vehicle, and did not violate his duty of care, and that does not go against social rules. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined, namely, the front wheel of the driver's vehicle, which are recognized as follows: (a) the front wheel of the driver's vehicle was faced with the vehicle operated by the victim beyond the safety zone; (b) the safety zone itself is prohibited from the entry of the vehicle under the Road Traffic Act (Article 13(5) of the Road Traffic Act; and in light of the defendant's statement at an investigative agency and the location of the vehicle's stopping, the safety zone