If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a real estate brokerage assistant of C real estate brokerage office.

No person, other than an authorized broker, shall use the name of an authorized broker or any similar name.

Nevertheless, around May 21, 2014, the Defendant introduced that G visited to purchase a site and building located in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Seoul, as the representative director of the above certified brokerage office, the Defendant issued a name stating "A" as the representative director of the above certified brokerage office, and issued a market price and price guidance related to the above site and building contract.

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a certified broker, he used the name similar to that of the certified broker.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Complaint;

1. Evidential materials (such as photographs, etc.), tape-records, and print-out of screen pictures on the Raf website;

1. Application of each police investigation reporting statute;

1. Article 49 (1) 2 and 8 of the relevant Act and Articles 49 of the Judicial Act as an alternative judicial broker for the preparation of facts constituting an offense, and the selection of a fine;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment.