Each of the facts charged in the instant case against the Defendant.

1. On December 10, 2009, Defendant A entered a company H (hereinafter “victim company”) which engages in the manufacture and sale of semiconductor equipment, and was engaged in the business of storing and managing all related data, such as the design drawings, etc. of the victim company, until he retires on December 31, 2010, Defendant A entered the victim company, which is engaged in the business of storing and managing wafers (the equipment to manufacture semiconductor chips) manufactured by the victim company related to semiconductor inspection equipment from the victim company until December 31, 2010. In the event of retirement, Defendant A was in charge of the business of storing and managing wafers to the wafers, which is an equipment that rapidly heatd and treated semiconductor chips (the equipment to manufacture Mafer and semiconductor chips). This material was a major business asset of the victim company, and there was a duty to return or destroy them.

Nevertheless, on December 31, 2010, the Defendant retired from the victim company on December 31, 2010, at the victim company's office located in Suwon City F. 1213, the Defendant performed a care at the victim company's office located in Suwon-gu I building F. 1213, and stored a total of 1,50 files, which are major business assets of the victim company (hereinafter "the data of this case") as shown in the attached crime list (1).

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the property value of the instant data, which is a major asset in business, and suffered property damage equivalent to the same amount in the victim company.

2. On August 6, 2013, Defendant B driven a J Carren van with a blood alcohol content of 0.226% under the influence of alcohol around 01:50 on August 6, 2013, Defendant B proceeded with a section of approximately 450 meters from the East apartment parking lot located in the Danam-si, Hasungnam-si to the road of about 196-4 of the same Ri.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Among the protocol of the trial, a statement to the effect that “the fact that the instant data was carried out by the mobile storage device as stated in its reasoning at the time, time, and place of the market”

1. Statement made by K in the protocol of the trial;

1. K. H.