2. The crime of this case is acknowledged that the Defendant transferred his electronic financial transaction access media to another person and subsequently transferred the electronic financial transaction access media under the name of the second son even after the Defendant was urged to have been used for the singing crime and then suspended, and that the Defendant had the record of being suspended from indictment for the same kind of crime, and that the account in connection with the actually transferred access media is used for the singishing crime.

However, the grounds for the above unfair sentencing alleged by the prosecutor are already considered by the court below in determining the defendant's punishment, and the sentencing conditions have changed differently.

There is no circumstance to see that there is no reason to view that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime, and that there is no reason to impose a fine exceeding the amount of fine, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below (one year of suspended sentence in June) is too uneasy and unfair because it is too uneasible within the reasonable scope of discretion.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.