beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.10 2012가합2807

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 105,00,000 as well as 6% per annum from September 17, 201 to January 30, 2012 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in the business of printing and the manufacturing and selling of floor decorations, and the Defendant (Seoul Metropolitan Government Gyeongdong Business Co., Ltd.) is a company that manufactures and sells excess for printing, etc., and the Nonparty A, upon withdrawal from the Defendant Company around 2008, sells products such as excessive products produced by the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant and sells them, such products as excessive products produced by the Defendant, and is paid a certain amount of the sales proceeds from the Defendant

B. The Plaintiff produced and delivered to Nonparty Han L&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “KCC”) and the KCC (hereinafter “KCC”). On April 2010, the Plaintiff received a proposal from Defendant A that “the Plaintiff would produce and supply the excess for prior use identical to that of B,” and then sent the Defendant’s production of the excess for prior use produced by the Defendant to the Defendant via A, prior to that time, after hearing the fact that the Plaintiff produced it from the Plaintiff using the excess for prior use, and the Defendant produced and delivered the excess for prior use by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff on May 10, 2010.” The Plaintiff was supplied to the Plaintiff on May 21, 2010 after testing the Defendant’s excessive products, and then supplied it to the Plaintiff on May 21, 2010 after being supplied to the Plaintiff on May 31, 2010 after being supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on May 21, 2010.

C. The Republic of Korea and KCC produce finished plates through the process of passing through the PVC master team for the board board board, along with the PVC master group supplied by the Plaintiff, in the process of producing a finished goods market using the for-board shop manufactured by the Plaintiff by using the for-board shop manufactured by the Defendant around June 2010. The inside of the red chron in the process of manufacturing the for-board shop manufactured by the Plaintiff by using the for-board shop manufactured by the Defendant at the above-board shop after the passage of the Defendant’s for-board shop.