마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses of the trial shall be borne by the defendant.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment determined by the court of the original instance (two years of suspended sentence of one year imprisonment for a term of imprisonment, two years of observation of protection, and additional collection of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment seems to have led to the confession and reflect on the crime.
Along to two months of detention, the time of reflectability became more time.
However, it is not necessary to take incidental measures such as strict punishment and surveillance of protection in order for the defendant to take a serious degree of punishment due to a lack of addiction.
may be seen.
Furthermore, it has been 30 years ago, 21 years ago, but there are criminal records of the same kind of suspended execution twice.
The fear of interference with entry or departure of the accused shall not be the reason for changing to a fine.
The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.
The judgment below
There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.
In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unfair.
3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is not reasonable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
In addition, according to Articles 191(1), 190(1), and 186(1) main text of the Criminal Procedure Act, it is right that the defendant bears the cost of the trial per deliberation.