2. The judgment of the court below is taking into account the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided, the defendant is the primary offender, etc. However, since the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have considerable social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, it is necessary to cut off and punish the business owner who operates illegal sexual traffic establishments even in order to prevent the spread of the illegal sexual culture and to establish a sound sexual culture, the defendant has engaged in arranging sexual traffic for a long period from March 18, 2013 to October 2013, and the defendant has engaged in arranging sexual traffic for a period of time from March 18, 2013 to around August 7, 2013; the defendant has been on August 19, 2013; the act of arranging sexual traffic continues to engage in the same business at each same place on August 28, 2013; the circumstances of the defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic; the circumstances of the crime in this case; and the circumstances of the crime in this case;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.