However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 25, 2016, at 00:25, the Defendant: (a) reported that he did not pay a taxi fee on the front of the store store store store store merchant; and (b) sent to the police officer on the ground that he was unbured by the slope C belonging to the Police Station B District of the month of the month of dispatch, and requested him to return home after paying the taxi fee on the front of the store store store store; (c) expressed his desire to the said police officer, “I am dead, and die, as I am, I am. I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., am., I am., am., I am., am., am., I am., am., and am., I am. am., I am., and interfere with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and work place;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (i.e., the confession and the attitude against the police officer; the degree of violence against the police officer is relatively minor; the police officer's punishment is not imposed against the defendant due to an agreement with the damaged police officer; and the defendant has no same criminal record);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;