Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around Jeju City, which is one of the land owned by the Defendant, arbitrarily moved a stone fence on the land owned by the victim E, which marks the boundary of the land owned by the victim in D, and thereby making it impossible to recognize the boundary of the land owned by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A statement explaining the grounds for complaint;

1. Division of the results of cadastral survey;

1. Ten copies of the investigation report (to visit the suspect's residence and to confirm the boundary with the land on which the suspect has filed a complaint), on-site photographs

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by the landowner-owned telephone);

1. Application of investigation report (examination of the fact that the suspect's boundary is invadedd) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 370 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;