If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim B, he did not have the intent or ability to repay.

November 1, 2010, Busan Dong-gu

C. If the victim of the victim's Dogra 201 residing in the E-Trade Union loans a gold of three million won to get the victim to get to and off from work and make payment in installments at a monthly rate of three million won on several occasions, the victim's Dogra 201 who believed that he/she would be able to get the victim to purchase the Dotoba, and he/she has transferred three million won to the deposit account in the name of the defendant, i.e., the

(b) On the 11th day of the same month, 1.5 million won shall be deposited in a deposit account in the name of the Eno-Mapo District Office in the name of the defendant, and on the 11st day of the same month, and on the 1.5 million won shall be deposited in a deposit account in the name of the Saemaeul District Office in the name of the defendant, and on the 1.5 million won shall be transferred from the victim who believed to be true.

(c) On January 6, 2011, in order to pay two million won to the victim in return for a false statement that, in order to operate a sidewalk at the 1 Dong community credit cooperative located in the Si/Gun/Gu in Busan as of January 6, 201, it has lent two million won as operating expenses to operate the sidewalk, and one million won has been issued from the victim in tin;

D. On the 14th day of the same month, the Defendant’s house 102, the 180,000 won in the Dong-gu Busan City, the sum amounting to 8,300,000 won was received from the victim as a loan, and acquired by fraud, such as lending the amount equivalent to 1,80,000 won in the sidewalk to 1,80,000 won in the sidewalk, so that 1,80,000 won in the sidewalk may be lent.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of passbook transactions;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.