A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles are only the victim E, first of all, tried to keep the Defendant from scambling with the Defendant as her scambling disease, and such act constitutes self-defense, and the victim’s injury cannot be recognized. 2) Even if the Defendant was found guilty of unfair sentencing on the ground of unfair sentencing, the punishment imposed by the court below (700,000 won of fine) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below 1 on the part of the defendant's assertion of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles: (i) the victim E stated that the defendant himself was suffering from the body of his body by cutting down his breath in his breathic body; (ii) the witness H made a statement to the effect that the victim was enjoying breath in the court of the court below and the defendant was suffering from breath in the breathic body; (iii) the victim's statement to the effect that the victim was broken out in the form of breathic body; and (iv) the victim's statement to the effect that the victim was broken out in the court of the court of the court of the court of the court below, and that the victim's breathic body was not only the victim's head, but also the victim's breathic body, but also the victim's statement to the effect that he was made more objectively after the victim's oral statement.