2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes, and that the amount of damage is not significant, etc. are favorable circumstances, or that the Defendant had seven identical power, including three-time criminal records, one-time criminal records, one-time criminal records, and one-time criminal records, and has compensated the victims.

In full view of all the sentencing factors shown in the arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.