If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 17:10 on March 19, 2013, the Defendant pointed out that it is inappropriate to say that the victim F (39 years of age) who is a professor is a professor at the Seoul E-School Office of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, as of March 19, 2013, the Defendant called "Nee" when the Defendant, the office chief, refers to the professor, and that it was inappropriate to say that he was "Neeee". The Defendant was able to fight one another with the upper left side of the Defendant, when 2 parts of the

The defendant injured the victim's face on the front side of the victim's head by displaying a malmat of plastic material on the victim's face, and caused the victim to tear about 1§¯ on the left side of the victim's head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to suspect F counterpart photographs and mix photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of self-defense under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order asserts that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense or excessive self-defense, since the defendant's act as stated in the judgment in order to defend him as he was faced with face by the victim while he was sold to G.

In light of the victim's act, the attitude and degree of the defendant's act known by evidence, etc., it cannot be viewed as self-defense or excessive defense. Thus, this part of the argument is rejected.