However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 18:00 on December 7, 2012, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving a C-Wnd-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-C-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-C-Wed

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not look at the right side and the left side of the vehicle, and by negligence proceeded with the victim D(71 years of age) with the right side from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant, which was the victim D(71 years of age) with the front part of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, which caused approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment due to the occupational negligence as seen above, such as the hump of the hump of a tree that requires a medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the first offender, the fact that the automobile is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the reflective fact, etc.);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;