If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 17, 2013, at around 04:30, the Defendant discovered the patrol vehicle carried by E in the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station D commander of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station D commander of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station, who was called up to handle the 112 reported case on the front of the C hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and the patrol vehicle carried by F police officer, and bricked the patrol vehicle, and fricked the patrol vehicle, and fricked the time expenses.

In order to restrain F from doing so, F assaulted F with a fage, etc., and the Defendant abused F with a fage, etc., and obstructed F’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to police officers’ patrol duties. In order to restrain F from doing so, E took the part of F’s fage E, who tried to speak from the patrol vehicle, one time as his head, and obstructed F’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;