However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

1. Defendant A, around 00:50 on November 5, 2012, at the Mapo-si E-si parking lot, the victim B, who was a senior Korean-dong, who met only for a long time at the Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, called “sick complete swine Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad., Defendant A suffered injury to the victim B, who was

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place, as described in paragraph (1) above, was plucked to the victim A’s face by drinking, and plucking up and plucking up the right hand with the victim’s face, thereby making it difficult for the victim A to take approximately four weeks of closed-end treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Case No. 1]

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (B);

1. The victim's photograph (the second crime committed on board);

1. The defendant B's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (A);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ Selection of Punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the Defendants are against each other, and that Defendant A deposited KRW 3,00,000);