If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

After entering the Republic of Korea as industrial trainee in 199, on June 20, 2004, the defendant conspiredd with D to report a marriage with D despite the absence of intention to marry with D introduced by C to receive a marriage visa for the purpose of staying in Korea.

On August 12, 2010, the Defendant, along with D and C, entered “D”, “A” and personal information in the husband column of the marriage report in Seongbuk-gu civil petition office of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, the Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, on August 12, 2010, and entered the marriage report in the name side of the husband, affixed the seals or signatures of the “E”, “C” and their personal information, and written the marriage report in the witness column, and submitted the marriage report to the public official in charge of the Vietnam along with the documents issued by the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the public official in

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D and C to make a false report to the public official and made a false report to enter false facts in the family register information system of the Supreme Court, which is a public electronic record, and exercised it by allowing the public official to keep it at around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of a protocol of suspect examination of police officer C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the marriage report, family relation certificate, marriage relation certificate and foreigner registration record card;

1. Article 228 (1), Articles 229 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have any previous record of the reason for sentencing of the sentencing order under Article 334(1). The Defendant, as Vietnam, has resided in Korea for not less than ten years and raises his wife alone. The Defendant actually caused the instant crime by her husband, and for a long time in Korea.