A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case even though the victim did not meet the above although the defendant had a movement against the victim by misunderstanding of facts, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of a fine of KRW 700,000 imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is sufficiently recognized, since it is sufficiently recognized that he/she had a plastic paper containing a batch for the victim's face, and that the victim has suffered a face on the right side requiring medical treatment for 14 days. Thus, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. In full view of all the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, including the content of the crime of unfair sentencing, the part and degree of injury, the circumstances after the crime, and the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the lower court is not deemed unreasonable even when considering the favorable circumstances alleged by the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.