A, B, D, E, F, and G shall be punished by a fine of 300,00 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 20,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B, along with H on September 15, 2013, issued seven copies of the I building No. 404 Dong 101 and 101 in Chuncheon City, using card 52, and carried out gambling, namely, “hulule” in the way of setting off a card of the same pattern or of the same number at approximately 10 to 15 minutes in 15 minutes.

2. Defendant D, Defendant F, Defendant E, and Defendant G, together with other Defendants posted approximately KRW 10 to 15 minutes each at the said temporary location using approximately 48 minutes each at approximately 10 to 15 minutes each time, and 140,800 won each at several times and carried out the gambling called “high saw”.

3. Defendant C, at the above temporary location, provided the above A, B, H, D, F, E, and G with the Defendant’s house, and provided cards and ruptures so as to assist them in gambling by having them do the gambling called “hullar” and “hulna” as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A, B, D, E, F, and G: The main sentence of Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant C: Articles 246(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant C: Articles 32(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. As to the Defendants’ assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendants asserted that there was no illegality of the determination of the Defendants’ assertion on the date and place indicated in the facts of the crime, but it was merely a fact that the Defendant, who was aware of the facts of the crime, carried out a “hulh” or “hulhh” or “hulhh” in a place, but it was merely an act of carrying out food or singing at the Defendant’s house, which was a temporary recreation.

According to each statement of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants, the Defendants were imprisoned as gambling at the time of the police investigation on September 2013.