[criminal record] On April 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoggu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the above punishment on October 23, 2016. On April 26, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 4, 2018.

[2] On January 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car parking lot located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 466; and (b) opened a car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-related car-

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. A photograph of a CCTV course;

1. Previous convictions: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to the same type of judgment attached), personal confinement status, and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes: The circumstances that are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 39(1) have been punished several times including the same kind of crime; in particular, the circumstances that the crime of this case was committed without being aware of during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime: confession and reflect: the amount of damage is a small amount; theft of the records of the crime in which the judgment has already become final and conclusive; and there is a need to consider equity in the case of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act with regard to the concurrent crimes. Other circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., are determined as ordered by the order.