If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

【The Defendant is the representative of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment C, and the victim D(67) is the above apartment management complaint.

On November 2016, the representative meeting of the above apartment occupants decided to remove the KT relay installed on the above apartment rooftop, and the victim, who is the managing director, sent the notice of request for removal three times at the KT to the KT, and requested the removal by telephone from time to time, but the KT did not comply with the request for removal on the ground that there was no adequate alternative place, and the defendant was well aware of such situation before and after.

【Criminal facts in the above apartment community center on August 24, 2017: at around 19:00, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the delay in the removal of the KT Heavy meter; and the victim’s “the need to receive money” in the above apartment community center on August 24, 2017;

dyscopia scopia

From KT to this end, we tried to make such remarks, and see why much obsium and why he is removed from KT (China);

c. Sponsor in receipt of money:

(A) I understand that money has been received;

Magman도요

G. Sysari, why you have continued to defend KT, and why you have received money.

Maternly flusium flusium

Escoping a tape recorder and arbitr receiving money;

why is the first day (the second day) removal;

Many-to-day,

Purpose of removal;

Many dysty dynace

I am special about whether you can file a complaint for a year or not, and so long as I am special about this day, I am special about it.

By continuing to hold the victim’s statement “,” the victim publicly insultingd the victim as if he/she had delayed handling of duties after receiving back payment from KT.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the confinement of a workhouse (the Defendant and his defense counsel did not have the intention of insult or the performance.