beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.09.29 2016가단112938

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship 1 between the parties is that the plaintiffs are the Cheongju-gu D apartment (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) Defendant A is the chairman of the management of the instant apartment around October 2013, and Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is the controlled entity of the instant apartment at the same time, and Defendant B was the head of the management office of the instant apartment at the same time as Defendant B was the employee of the Defendant Company.

B. 1) The lawsuit claiming damages in lieu of defect repair is the council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment complex (hereinafter “council of occupants’ representatives”).

(2) On December 7, 2007, the council of occupants' representatives held a briefing session to explain that “The business entity may directly repair defects in cash instead of directly receiving defect repairs from the business entity.” On March 6, 2008, the council of occupants' representatives entered into a contract for the investigation of defect related to the apartment of this case, stating that “The council of occupants' representatives may directly repair defects in cash, with the result of the inspection of defect in lieu of directly receiving defect repairs from the business entity.” The council of occupants' representatives entered into a contract for the investigation of defect related to the apartment of this case, stating that “The council of occupants' representatives shall submit a report on defect investigation by July 31, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as “G”) and “The council of occupants' representatives shall pay 14% of the judgment amount to the service price (7% of the cost of the inspection of defect and 7% of the honorarium for the first instance trial) such as

(3) On November 14, 2008, the council of occupants' representatives received a report on the inspection of defects that the cost of repairing defects reaches KRW 1,261,610,532 from G, and filed a lawsuit claiming KRW 1.5 billion as damages in lieu of the repair of defects with the Cheongju District Court (Cheongju District Court 2008Gahap4954 case; hereinafter referred to as "the Cheongju District Court 2008Gahap4 case") on November 14, 2008.

Cheongju District Court: (a) February 24, 2012; (b) “H Co., Ltd., Ltd., together with the council of occupants’ representatives, 949,46.