However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 4, 2014, at around 00:50, the Defendant, while driving a BM5 car at the distance of Jeonnam University located in Jeonnam-dong, Gwangju, with drinking alcohol, was seated on the driver’s seat while stopping at a two-lane between four-lanes of letter.

Upon receipt of a report, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and requested to respond to the alcohol alcohol measurement by inserting approximately 30 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from the slope C belonging to the Gwangju Northern Police Station, taking a smell on the face, etc., and driving under the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, the defendant alleged that he did not drive a drunk, and did not comply with a police officer's request for sobreath test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Descriptions of the report on detection of the driver and the report on the status of the driver; and

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph pertaining to drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of penalty, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confessions and reflects);

1. An order to attend a lecture shall be rendered for the reasons under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;