폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended execution for one year of imprisonment, one hundred and twenty hours of community service, confiscation) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below received interest higher than the limited interest rate while running a unregistered credit business, and it is found that the nature of the crime is very poor, such as threatening the victims, confinement, and taking property in the course of debt collection, but the defendant consented to the time and wrongs of each of the crimes of this case, the victims and the victims agreed to do so smoothly, and the victims did not want the punishment of the defendant. In full view of all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable. Thus, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.