beta
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2020.05.28 2019가단57225

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant,

A. From June 21, 2018 to May 28, 2020, Plaintiff A and B each amount of KRW 4,000,000 and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From June 2017, Plaintiff B and the Defendant were taking part in the teaching system for about one year.

Plaintiff

A is the mother of Plaintiff B.

Plaintiff

B and A are residing in the G Building H located in Echeon-si F.

B. The plaintiff C and D are married couple and are residing in the G Building J in Ischeon City I.

C. On July 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) filed a move-in report with K on July 17, 2018; (b) filed a move-in report with the Si/Ma located in Seongbuk-si on February 25, 2019; (c) filed a move-in report with L on May 3, 2019; (d) filed a move-in report with the said G building on June 24, 2019; and (e) filed a move-in report with L on August 7, 2019; and (e) filed a move-in report with N andO on November 5, 2019.

The defendant committed each of the crimes as stated in the separate facts constituting the crime, and was sentenced to imprisonment on August 19, 201, suspension of execution of two years, suspension of qualifications, and two years of suspension of qualifications on August 19, 2019. In addition, probation, 40 hours of violent therapy, and orders for community service for 160 hours.

(2018 Godan1186). E.

Although the Defendant complained of the Plaintiff B’s injury, residential intrusion, intimidation, defamation, etc., the said Plaintiff was subject to a disposition by the Prosecutor’s Office on February 11, 2019.

F. The Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff C as a crime of injuring the Plaintiff, but the said Plaintiff was subject to a disposition by the Prosecutor’s Office on December 26, 2018.

[Evidence Evidence: Descriptions of Evidence Nos. 1 through 9 and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant committed the crime of intrusion upon residence, violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act, assault and insult against the plaintiff Eul, his residence intrusion against the plaintiff Eul, violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act, violence and insult against the plaintiff Eul, violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act, violation of the plaintiff Eul's Protection of Communications Secrets Act, crime of intrusion upon residence, and violation of the plaintiff Eul's residence intrusion against the plaintiff Eul. Thus, the defendant suffered mental suffering suffered by the plaintiffs due to each of the above crimes.