However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

1. At around 21:00 on April 7, 2020, Defendant A, upon receiving 112 a report that “fences occurred” in front of the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant committed assault by the police officer affiliated with the D police box of Sungnam-gu, Police Station D, who called for, under the influence of alcohol to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the police officer E, who was under the influence of alcohol, and threatened him with the attitude that he would be under the influence of his hand, and received several parts of the body of head E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of police officers' duties on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

2. At around 21:00 on April 7, 2020, Defendant B, who was the Defendant’s her mother, was subject to the control of the police officer as prescribed in paragraph (1) of this Article, and the Defendant also went to flight. The Defendant, who was sent to the scene, took a bath to the police officer F of the police box of the Sungnam Police Station, who was sent to the scene, and took a brucated f by hand, and was investigated by the D police box located in Sungnam-si G in Sungnam-si, A, who was under the control of the police officer in charge of the police box of the Sungnam Police Station at the scene of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Manam-si, 2020, and abused the police officer in charge of the bru

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of police officers' duties on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the law to the Defendants’ legal statement E and F of each police statement on the spot photo (22 pages of investigation records)

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants under suspended execution: The scope of the applicable sentencing under the law for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing) (the following sentencing): the scope of the recommended sentencing (the accused) according to the sentencing guidelines for one to five years of imprisonment [the decision of the type] [the scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties] [the scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties [the category 1]/ the coercion of official duties [the scope of the recommended area and the recommendation] [the scope of the recommended area and the recommendation] basic area, six months to June.