beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.08.24 2015고정2074

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015, 2074"

1. On January 20, 2014, the Defendant ordered the Victim G to pay an amount equivalent to KRW 213,000,00, such as alcohol and alcohol, at the Fnonoa Town located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu. < Amended by Act No. 12134, Jan. 20, 2014>

However, the defendant, B, and C had no intention or ability to pay the drinking value because H had already left the place.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, by deceiving the victim as above, and by being provided with the same as the above, he acquired the same from the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the date, time, and place of the foregoing 1.1. paragraph (1) of this Article, when he was requested by the GJ of the Incheon Jungbu Police Station to disclose his name and resident registration number, and said that his type of K’s resident registration number was the Defendant’s resident registration number.

In this respect, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

"2015 High Court 2603"

1. Around 18:40 on January 6, 2014, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle of the Incheon L-Woo-hurg in the state of being under the influence of alcohol from approximately 8km section of blood alcohol concentration of 0.093% (the application of the Fmark formula) at around 11-1, as a large well as from the Yong-dong of Incheon, Nam-gu to the Jung-gu, Incheon.

2. On January 6, 2014, around 19:56, the Defendant forged private documents, within the N District located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City M, and, on the grounds of the foregoing paragraph (1), as if the Defendant’s resident registration number was followed by the N District Police Team’s O on the ground of the foregoing paragraph (1), made the Defendant believe it as a type K, and made the report on the state-employed driver’s statement, and signed and sealed it in the name of “K”.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the report on the state of the driver, signed and sealed in the name of K, which is a private document.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above-mentioned 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-3-2-3-3-3-3-4