However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On June 18, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Daejeon District Court’s Support for Incheon District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 3, 2019, at around 21:18, the Defendant driven a D-wing truck under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.066% from a section of approximately 4.6km from the front of the C-cafeteria located in the Gongju-si, Mari-si, the Mari-si, the Hanju-si, to the Hanju-si, the Hanju-si, the Hanju-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Control note;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes (verification of the same kind of power and review of the amended Road Traffic Act);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is based on a comprehensive consideration of the records and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the trial process, including the following: (a) the past crime of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Order to Attend the lecture; (b) the blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant crime; and (c) the driving distance is short; and (c) there