However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the victim slopeD belonging to the Magdong Police Station C District District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on domestic violence-related 112 on November 13, 2016, was not abnormal about the details of the report and the details of the report for the Defendant and the Defendant, children, and then returned to the 112 patrol lane, the Defendant and the victim “Iskh is a police officer.”

The victim spawd "bling the city expenses, spabling the victim's breath, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in relation to the handling of 112 reports by making the victim's face twice by drinking the ppuri.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to subsidiary photographs damaged by police officers in mobilization;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (the scope of a recommended sentence) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine (the scope of a recommended sentence) shall interfere with the execution of public services;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Order.