2. In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the record of judgment, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant had had the intent to commit an indecent act against the Defendant at the time when the victim’s bucks and chests were delivered.

The Defendant and the victim met on the day of the instant case (1) The victim met with the Defendant as an entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking, and she met with E, which is the Defendant’s seat. On October 12, 2016, the Defendant first met with E, and on October 13, 2016, the following day, a separate contact with the Defendant was made on October 13, 2016 without E.

(2) The Defendant, along with the pro-Japanese J, went back to the victim, and the J made the following statements at the court of the first instance.

In the course of drinking together with the defendant, the victim called the victim's telephone to write the door on the following day. The defendant made a defect to write the door, and the victim made a gift to K, which led to this, and the defendant and the defendant attempted to do so. However, the telephone again made a call from the victim first, and the victim made a call to do so. The same is the same when the victim wanted to do so."

B. On October 13, 2016, at the time when the Defendant and the victim jointly taken photographs, the Defendant and the victim worked the cell phone camera of the Defendant at the c head office on the victim’s cell phone and taken photographs together. However, in the case where the Defendant and the victim were tightly seated with the Defendant and the victim, or the Defendant saw the victim’s chest immediately below the victim’s chest by her hand, the Defendant’s son was on the chest of the victim.