A. The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In full view of the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing on the Defendant appears to have been appropriately determined by fully taking account of all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, and no special circumstance exists to the extent that the lower court’s sentencing is modified.

Therefore, the above unfair sentencing argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. Thus, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.