However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On November 9, 2014, at around 00:00, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the main point of “D” in the operation of the victim C (n, 52 years of age) in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s main store business by force by cutting off the table glass for about 30 minutes, such as cutting off the table and cutting off the table, without any justifiable reason.

2. On November 9, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) the victim guard F (54 years of age) belonging to the Gyeyang Police Station Eabox, who was called out after receiving a report on November 9, 2014, prevented visitors from committing an act of gathering trial expenses; and (b) the victim patroler G (30 years of age) belonging to the same police box in the elbow bow; and (c) the victim patroler (30 years of age) belonging to the same police box in the elbow bow bow, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of F, C, and G;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines set forth in the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] is that where the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (no special person) is concurrent crimes with an offense for which the sentencing guidelines set are not set, the lower limit is subject to the sentencing guidelines set in the sentencing guidelines for the offense for which the sentencing guidelines set.

2. The fact that the defendant's decision on the sentence of this case recognized the crime of this case, there is no criminal record of the same kind and suspended execution, and agreed with the victim C, and deposited for the victim police officers.