However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is an employee who worked in “D” operated by the victim C.

On February 21, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 18:25 on February 21, 2019; and (b) during the Government-Si, the Defendant: (c) exercised “F” owned by the victim, which had been placed on the books inside the store in the process of raising the victim’s place; (d) by gathering one copy of documents on the list of customers subject to goods in his/her own bank and then cutting off the store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic materials;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act recognize the Defendant’s crime, the primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment, the property value of stolen documents is not so significant, and the Defendant returned it to the victim, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive means of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., as a whole, shall be determined as per the disposition, by taking into account all the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and means of crime