업무상횡령
1. Defendant A is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendant is publicly notified.
2. Defendant B is punished.
Defendant (Defendant B) served as the deputy head of the administrative agency from August 3, 2015.
The Defendant, while serving as the Vice-Administrative Director, received total of KRW 30 million, including city expenses of KRW 20,000 and KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the Gwangju Metropolitan City, and engaged in the storage and use of the subsidy.
Subsidies received from Gwangju Viewing shall be used in accordance with the purpose of the grant of subsidies and the details and conditions of the subsidy program in accordance with the relevant ordinances, etc., and shall not be used for any other purpose, and after completion of the subsidy program, the details of the use of the subsidy shall be submitted to the competent authority for the settlement and return
Nevertheless, the Defendant, in relation to the “F” business, prepared a tax invoice of KRW 2 million to the representative H of “G” under the pretext of an actual inspection banner, and wired the amount of KRW 2 million from the H’s account to the H’s Gwangju Bank account on October 15, 2015, and subsequently, on October 19, 2015, the “F” in the indictment as of October 19, 2015 is obvious that it is a clerical error, and thus, ex officio correction is made.
The amount of KRW 1,048,00 among them shall be returned from H in cash in front of the building in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area I and then embezzled by using it for private purposes in Gwangju.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the witness J and H;
1. Statement made by the police with H;
1. A copy of the report on the results of the settlement of subsidy projects conducted in 2015, a copy of the F subsidy settlement notification, a copy of the settlement report of project costs, and a copy of the decision to grant subsidies;
1. According to each of the above evidence, the Defendant’s payment of advertising fees to H with subsidies received from the Gwangju Metropolitan City may obtain the excess payment from the Gwangju Metropolitan City and then obtain the return of the excess payment and use the excess differently from the purpose of the subsidy.
On the other hand, however,