2. In light of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime of the same crime, and that the majority of the victims and the amount of damage did not reach an agreement with the victims because damage recovery was almost possible, and the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims. Considering the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the circumstances that the Defendant reflects the confession.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.