However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who has a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on March 4, 2009, and Defendant B is a person who has a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on March 6, 2003.

1. Defendant A, even though being aware that he/she was a spouse B, was a person who was a spouse, was sent to the Defendant, around 10:00 on April 14, 201, the F apartment in Gunsan-si, 401, 204, and 204 on a single sexual intercourse with B at the same time.

2. Defendant B was aware that he was a spouse, and the date, time, place, as described in paragraph (1) above, and her sexual intercourse with A once as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each complaint, each letter of complaint, each certificate of divorce, each duplicate photograph, and the Acts and subordinate statutes of the institute of lawsuit and evidence;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act and the second sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act (the main sentence between the two parties);

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (The following circumstances are taken into account: (a) Defendant A has no past record of criminal punishment for the last ten years; and (b) Defendant B has no past record of criminal punishment)