1. On September 5, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, in front of the “D cafeteria” located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, A around 00:59 on September 5, 2018, on the ground that the Defendant: (a) on the ground that, upon receiving a report from 112, the police officers F of the E District of the Sungnam Police Station E District, called out, requested the Defendant to leave the vehicle as a dangerous delivery; and (b) that, “nicks are designated.”

d) why the police has been damaged;

periods of origin;

내가 뭘 잘못했냐.

‘F' and assaulted on the right hand of F at one time at the right hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

2. The Defendant, on September 5, 2018, arrested a flagrant offender with interference with the performance of official duties, such as paragraph (1) at around 01:10 on September 5, 2018, and was led to a “E District” located in Sungnam-si G, Sungnam-si, and thereafter, at that place, the victim F, who is the police officer, and the victim H “c typ typ typ typ typh,” and the Defendant:

Drhums shall die and throw away.

"A person who is detained by detention, is not arrested, and a person who dies of a disease in the Republic of Korea."

The victims were openly insulting under the circumstances where I et al. are observed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A H statement;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of handling reported cases;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (joint crimes of insult);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. Where the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] on the sentencing criteria, the scope of the punishment [the scope of the punishment] shall be the mitigated area (one month or August) (the special mitigated person] [the degree of interference with the execution of official duties], and the degree of violence or official duties is minor, the application of the standards for handling multiple crimes: Imprisonment for not less than one month (the offense of insult for which no sentencing guidelines have been set and the offense of insult under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act).