A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant

B On June 27, 2012, the Suwon District Court sentenced 1 year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and the judgment was finalized on September 7, 2012.

[2013 Highest 390] [Defendant A]

1. Around July 27, 2009, the Defendant committed the crime of July 27, 2009, lent one million won to the victim D in front of the smuggling, which was living in the country of smuggling, around July 27, 2009.

9. The payment shall be made up to 30.

However, the victim, at the time, bears a debt amounting to KRW 100 million, and did not have any intention or ability to repay the debt even if he/she borrowed money from the victim. The Defendant was granted KRW 1 million from the victim in the name of the borrowed money. This was the Defendant by deceiving the victim, thereby receiving property from the Defendant. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant, who committed the crime on May 2, 2012, was in the F office located in the F office, F office, “If he/she borrowed KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, he/she was paid the money to D to the maximum extent possible.

“The victim did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if he borrowed money from the victim, as described in paragraph (1). The Defendant received KRW 500,000 from the victim, i.e., money borrowed from the victim. Accordingly, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received property. The Defendant, on June 12, 2012, committed the crime committed on June 12, 2012, may produce revenue from the Defendant to the Doctrine Doc that purchased scrap metal generated in the course of dismantling the Doctrine, which was located in the Doctrine, in the course of the dissolution of the Doctrine, from June 12, 2012. The Defendant would receive the right to sell the Doctrine and lend KRW 13 million at the cost of purchasing the Doctrine, until September 15, 2012.

“.......”

However, in fact, there was no specific removal plan because of the lack of deliberation on removal, and even if the removal is carried out, the defendant is likely to have the right to sell scrap metal.