However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 22:13 on April 27, 2013, the Defendant, “D Company E(40 years of age)” in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, performed drinking together with the victim E(the victim E(the victim E). On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) left the part of the victim’s head one time; (b) left the part of the victim’s head one time; and (c) brought the victim’s head one time due to another small-scale disease, which is a dangerous thing that the victim was at the end of the back and back of the back; and (d) sustained four parts of the victim’s face with the victim’s face, so that the victim’s number of days of treatment could not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning Ethical images;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant because he/she was agreed with the victim, and that the defendant is the primary offender and is against the mistake);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Reexamination of these circumstances in the front);