However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 01:42 on September 2, 2015, the Defendant was unable to avoid a disturbance under the influence of alcohol in front of the “C cafeteria” located in the East Sea B.

피고인의 위와 같은 행위로 인해 112 신고가 들어와 동해경찰서 D지구대 소속 경위 E이 현장에 출동하였고, 피고인은 E으로부터 귀가할 것을 요청받자 순간 격분하여 E에게 욕설을 하면서 주먹을 휘두르고 발로 E의 정강이를 2-3회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the dispatch of 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work log in the D District, a list of reported cases in 112, and a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that there is no other criminal record than one fine, etc.) or more;