When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 26, 2015, from around 20:40 to 20:50 on March 26, 2015, the Defendant, with the influence of drinking in Eppons operated by the victim D in Jin-si from around 20:40 to around 20:50, stated that “A fine of one million won has been changed due to the interior,” and that he shall not be held as a funeral if so,. A person who does not perform a funeral is sounded, i.e., “a person who does not do so,” and sprinked in the abovepons from around 23:00 on the same day to around 23:10 on the same day, and again, “a fine of one million won has been imposed due to the collapse” and “a person who may perform a funeral, i.e., f., one million won, and the same year from around 23:50 on the same day.

3. From 27. 00:20 up to 20:20, customers on the head of the relevant head office were forced to get out of the Defendant’s diving, and interfere with the heading business of the relevant female by force by force, by letting the customers on the head of the relevant head office get out of the head of the relevant head office, such as “I d. He will d. He will not perform funeral. He will bring about drinking.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the amount of fine for summary order shall be reduced from KRW 2 million to KRW 1 million in consideration of the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing of the sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects his/her mistake and that the victim has agreed smoothly with the victim during the trial