업무방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Punishment of the crime
On February 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00 on February 24, 2017, the victim D operated by Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon; (b) was subject to criminal punishment for assault by the victim D; and (c) was found to have been subject to criminal punishment for assault by the victim F, who is the male Easter of the victim; and (d) paid a fine of KRW 3 million on account of the width.
Since he sonn, he did not enter the 30-minutes that he she saw or she had to enter the place, such as she took a bath with a large interest of “I amba, I amba.”
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the operation of Mat by force between approximately 30 minutes.
The defendant of "2018 Highest 33" is a passenger of a private taxi (H) driven by the victim G (65 years of age, female).
On July 21, 2017, the Defendant, at around 01:50 on July 21, 2017, arrived at the first road in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and did not pay KRW 3,300 to the victim, out of KRW 3,600.
Accordingly, the victim argued that it was wrong to talk about 300 won as a matter of course.
As such, the defendant, who was suffering from satch, was in his bad hand, flobbling the victim's body and pushing the victim's body, and was in his bad hand.
As a result, the defendant put the victim into 14 days of medical treatment, "influoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluorals, fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Highest 7594"
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of the witness J and D;
1. Written statements of victims: 2018 high group 33;
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness K and G;
1. Two-time protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the police against the accused (including cross-examination);
1. G statements;
1. The Defendant’s written diagnosis of injury [the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, in particular, the victim D and G’s statements (the main contents from the investigative agency are consistent) are consistent.