견책처분취소
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a patrol officer on August 29, 1992, and served in the Japanese police station on June 1, 2013, and served as a person for promotion to the police officer on June 1, 2013. From July 17, 2013 to July 17, 2013, the Plaintiff served as a patrol officer for Gwangju Western District Police Station B patrol team 4 teams.
B. On January 14, 2015, the General Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers of the Gwangju Western Police Station held a disciplinary meeting on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, and decided to reprimand the Plaintiff with respect to the following misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”). According to the above resolution, the head of the Gwangju Seo-gu Police Station issued a reprimand against the Plaintiff on January 14, 2015 on the ground that the instant misconduct in violation of Article 56 (Duty of Good Faith) of the State Public Officials Act and constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under Article 78 (1) 1 and 2 of the State Public Officials Act.
[Grounds for disciplinary action against the plaintiff] From July 17, 2013, the plaintiff worked as the patrol staff of the Gwangju Western Police Station B District Police Station B District 1, and the police officers were pointed out in the National Police Agency's comprehensive audit as a violation of duty by a police officer's driver's license, on the ground that the name of the CR system and the life of the CR system are only known, and that the CR system is only possible if he/she becomes aware of the fact that the name of the CR system and the life of the CR system are still old, and that the CR system is insufficient, it was pointed out that the police officer's duty to comply with all statutes and perform his/her duty to faithfully perform his/her duty.
C. On February 13, 2015, the Plaintiff, who filed a petition for review and administrative litigation, filed a petition review with the Ministry of Personnel Management to seek revocation of the instant disposition, but was dismissed on April 17, 2015.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff.