beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.09.14 2017고단4378

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

. The Defendant and B of the criminal history will be between South Korea and South Korea;

The defendant was allowed to open two mobile phones in the name of B, and he thought that he had an identification card from B for the opening of the phone, with the advertising of the two mobile phones in the name of B, without the consent of B, in addition to using two mobile phones in the name of B.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On November 30, 2012, the Defendant entered “B” in the column for confirmation of subscription, “E”, and “B” in the column for confirmation of subscription, at around November 30, 2012, at the D office located in the Dong-gu Daejeon apartment commercial building, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, with a stample, on the new service site located therein, and entered “B” in the column for confirmation of subscription.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant entered “B”, “E,” and “E***” in the Daejeon East-gu column, and written “B” in the column for identifying subscription at the place described in the above paragraph (a) around November 30, 2012, using a stample, on the new contract form for the service located at that place, and on the contact form for confirming subscription, the Defendant entered “B” in the column for confirming subscription.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. On November 30, 2012, the Defendant submitted a new service contract under the name of the forged SK Telecom Co., Ltd. at the time and place specified in Section 1-A. The Defendant submitted one copy of the new service contract under the name of the forged SK Telecom Co., Ltd., by using FAX as if it was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised one chapter of a forged new service contract.

B. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime at the time and place specified in Article 1-2(b).